Women On Waves

07 December 2011 28 Comments

One person, one idea… look at the outcome.

Rebecca Gomperts, Women On Waves

Rebecca Gomperts, founder of Women On Waves.

Did you know that every six minutes, somewhere in the world, a woman dies as a result of an illegal abortion? I didn’t and I am very glad that Dutch doctor Rebecca Gomperts, former Greenpeace activist, had a great idea that is saving many many lives… She founded Women On Waves, an organization known above all for a clinic ship that dispenses the RU486 pill to women who live in countries where abortion is illegal. But that is only a small part of what they do.

I recently met Rebecca and asked her a few questions:

How did everything start?

The idea came to me in 1997 when I was sailing on a Greenpeace ship in Central America: Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama… I was the ship doctor, but there was not much medical work to do, so I was painting the ship, organizing tours for visitors to the ship, and chatting with the crew members… During one of these group discussions, I realized that outside territorial waters (12 miles off the coast) local law no longer applies. The law of the country where the ship is registered does. That means that on a Dutch boat in international waters, abortion is legal.

Why did you think about abortion?

As a doctor, I was trained as an abortion provider in the Netherlands. As a woman, I knew that abortion is a huge problem around the world: it’s against the law in many countries and performed in unsafe ways. You see, I don’t think that having an abortion is an easy decision for any woman. Still, every year, about 41 million women worldwide choose to have an abortion for all sorts of reasons, and 20 million of them do it illegally. Making abortion illegal does not reduce the number of abortions, it just causes the needless death of a woman every six minutes.

Who are these women who are dying?

Most of them belong to the lower socioeconomic classes. White middleclass women usually find a way to abort even if it’s forbidden in their country, certain private clinics provide safe abortions in secret for a good sum of money. Legalizing abortion would make it more available to lower classes and prevent many tragic outcomes. When a woman dies from an abortion, her other children lose their mother, suffer psychologically, have less income, often don’t finish school, and are more likely to get involved in crime. All this has profound social consequences.

When was Women On Waves born?

After the initial inspiration I had onboard the Greenpeace ship, I did some legal research, made a plan, and started looking for money. It took me a couple of years. Other women decided to join me on this adventure and in 1999 Women On Waves was officially registered as a nonprofit foundation. The first private donations came from ten wealthy feminists. We used the money to put together our first mission: a boat sailing to Ireland.

How did it go?

We worked on it one year and a half. We had organized everything with the support of local pro-abortion groups, but things took a bad turn. When we were en route to Ireland, the international media started taking about our boat. There was a huge outcry and the government of the Netherlands declared that we couldn’t provide legal abortion on our boat. Of course we could, but the Irish pro-abortion groups lost their trust in us. They actually became very angry with us and we couldn’t do anything. After this huge media mess, we took our case to court in the Netherlands and were vindicated.

Other court cases?

Eleven so far against various parties.

Has the Dutch government always been hostile to your work?

Not really. When we first presented our project to the press in the Netherlands, in 1999, the Dutch Minister of International Development praised it as a “concrete solution to a concrete problem” and stated that the Dutch government should support it. This led to a parliamentary debate and extensive media coverage which attracted private donors. But after the outcry associated with our first mission, the Dutch government tried to stop us. They said we were giving bad publicity to Holland by exporting abortion. As a matter of fact, all abortion clinics in the Netherlands are government funded; we are the only one that doesn’t get any public funding.

After Ireland, you organized several other missions. What factors are crucial to their success?

The most important part is the local women’s organization that invites us. They prepare everything locally and we arrive with the ship. Our presence not only helps the women who visit us onboard, but also encourages debate in the media. That means it also attracts adverse reactions: that’s why all of us have had security training and we often hire security services. It may be very necessary. In Poland, for instance, the opposition was very violent.

What do local authorities usually do?

Generally speaking, local police try to avoid an international scandal so they make sure that demonstrations do not degenerate. They might defend us while at the same time preventing us from doing what we have set out to do. So we have to initiate complicated negotiations. There have been times when local authorities have gone… a bit too far.

An example?

In 2004 when we sailed to Portugal. Local anti-abortion groups – the most aggressive that we had met so far – had organized a big demonstration against us. When we were in international waters we were stopped by huge warships. The minister of defense Paolo Portez, a staunch Catholic, sent them to us asserting that we were threatening the national security of Portugal. This episode created such a scandal that the Dutch minister of foreign affairs had to intervene. Meanwhile the debate in the media and among people grew enormously, a new government came into power and two years later abortion was legalized. Six years later, in 2010, we brought the case to the European Court of Human Rights and we won.

Are there other countries that changed their laws following your actions?

Spain, but we can’t take all the credit for it. In fact public opinion was already very ripe and change was in the offing. In other parts of the world we didn’t get the laws to change, but there is much more awareness now in countries visited by our boat. Our actions are meant to encourage discussion in the media, inform the public, and invite politicians to address the problem. The boat is a good way to stimulate the debate, but it’s only a small part of our activity.

What else do you do?

We have been in Africa but not with a ship. We went to Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Malawi and other countries to train local women’s groups in how to deal with the problem. Among other things, we teach them how to use pills, IUDs, and condoms. Contraception can prevent abortions and women need to be informed. Unfortunately contraceptives are not foolproof. Indeed half of the women seeking an abortion in the Netherlands do use contraceptives. Anyway, our main work at the moment is to help women around the world to help themselves. Our website, which offers practical instruction and information, has over one million visitors per year. We also started a separate organization called Women On Web that answers about 8,000 emails per month and explains how to get an abortion with medicines women can buy over the counter. We have also set up safe abortion hotlines – in countries such as Ecuador, Chile, Peru, Argentina, Venezuela, Pakistan, Indonesia – run by local organizations. They all dispense medical information.

How can they legally teach people how to get an abortion on the phone in countries where abortion is illegal?

They don’t teach how to get an abortion, they give scientific information. For instance: “According to the World Health Organization, a woman that uses this medicine will have a 90% possibility of miscarriage”. Here they are referring to a stomach drug, Misoprostol, that can also provoke a miscarriage. It’s not the best method, but it may be the best method under certain conditions. In Pakistan you can buy it over the counter for one dollar. One dollar can save a woman’s life.

How many women have been helped so far by your organization?

I have no idea about numbers because our outreach goes far beyond our contacts. The local organizations that we train can go on to help hundreds or thousands of women… It’s about empowering people.

The next destination for the Women On Waves boat?

It’s top secret. And we also do many other top secret actions There is no need to publicize everything we do, especially when we operate in countries where it’s really dangerous.

  • Annie

    Rebecca Rocks !

  • Against

    Sterilization! Isn’t it a better idea? And you don’t have to kill anyone!  I’m wondering how can you call this shameful dealings a help? And I hope that you dear Rebecca that you are proud of yourself! Just think how many innocent beings have been murdered thanks to you! Chapeau au bas!

    • Silkaren

      We should sterilizate all the males in the worlds, that is true. 

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nancy-Reisiger-Rice/100001095785143 Nancy Reisiger Rice

        Abortion effectively castrates men from the privilege of being a father.  No wonder there are so many angry men out there!  These people just might as well cut off your testicles and take away your manhood!

      • Jim

        The privilege of being a father? Unfortunately, sometimes the condom breaks…

      • Julia

        this nancy person must be a troll! very funny, now go play w ur friends HA HA HA

    • Astrid

      You are
      right. In fact when I heard about a 13 years old girl wanted to have abortion
      after being raped, I thought: “My God, why her mother didn’t think of
      sterilizing her before the rape?”

    • http://www.enzodalverme.com/blog enzo dal verme

      I am in
      favor of sterilization to prevent suffering. For the same reason I am very much
      in favor of abortion.  In UK a
      charity is offering cash to drug addicted that are willing to undergo
      sterilization. I would offer them food, not money…

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11545519

      Anyway, an
      unwanted child from parents with serious problems will most likely suffer and cause
      suffering. Contraception, sterilization, abortion can avoid unnecessary
      suffering.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nancy-Reisiger-Rice/100001095785143 Nancy Reisiger Rice

        Contraception, sterilization and abortion are immoral because they contradict the Natural Law.  You are not God.  You cannot create anything.  And if you kill a created innocent child that God desires for His plan, you are taking it upon yourself the power of life and death that belongs to God alone!  You will pay in the end for your selfishness!  Repent!

      • Guest

        I would love to see a fanatic like you say that to a rape victim’s face. I would also love to hear how moral your god is to purposefully plan and create failing embryos in careful, healthy mothers like I was, with conditions that lead to a prognosis of certain death, after great suffering… no medicine, no surgery, no nothing that can heal or allow any kind of lifespan – just the baby will likely die any moment and would never survive birth. That is the reason I utilized the procedure. I, not your magic man, had the guts to spare the suffering of my beloved child – a decision that is never ever easy for any woman. I truly don’t know who people like you think you are – the things you say are about a loving, life-giving god? ..and your pedestal over others to shout down from and your hatred towards others is pure and holy and all the things you think it is? You are a deeper perversion of other human beings bodies than their personal decisions could ever be. Shut up and crack a book or two, because it sounds like the only thing you have to say has been fed to you by someone passing a money tray. 

        Good riddance, I’ve everything I need from the article and could care less if you have a reply. 

      • Karin

        So your God is making plans for a teen ager to be raped, a woman to be abandoned by her man once she tells him that she is pregnant, a woman to become pregnant without having the means to sustain a baby… in other words, your God is making plans to create problems but… not to create solutions. What kind of God is that? Please have a better chat with God and find out that you wrote about what’s in your mind and not about God’s will.

      • Julia

        antibiotics also contradicts the natural law. it was god´s plan for you to get ill, so you will only go to heaven if you stop taking it when u get sick, all right? 

      • Believeirornot

        Nancy you are right about God…………..Its God who creates and its he who decides on everything that is to do with human, animals and nature as he is the father of creations. I too dont take medicine as I am a pentecostal christian. But then God has not told us that we will go to hell if we take medicine. Its true that God creates the baby – but then why does he allow the woman to suffer alone with the illegal babies – when the responsible man abondones her – do you say that its God’s plan? We just cannot connect every single thing with GOD. God has given man and woman teh freedon to choose what is right and what is wrong. This he did during teh time of Adam and Eve – and its man and woman who commit sin and then suffer through that. So its not right to connect abortion, rape, sexual intercourse, antibiotics, etc, etc with God – Just because you are a christian you cannot connect everything with God. We christians say that its God will all the time – but then, when good and bad things happen to non christians – how do you relate it with God. Are they not created by the same God?? According to the Holy Bible its wrong to kill lives – and when you say lives it does not only mean the lives of human beings but also teh lives of animals. Hindus and Buddhists religious people dont kill animals for their food – but we christians and muslims kill animans for food – so isnt it killing lives – ???? Does the Bible exactly speak about abortion?? My opinion is that abortion has to be allowed in some cases – such as rape or when a girl is made pregnant and then abondaoned by the boy. But then in between a legal couple or between a couple liing together as husband and wife – whdy should there be abortions as such if they plan their family life ahead on time. So allowing an abortion or not or legalizing an abortion or not should depend on the situation, circumstances of the affected or vulnerable and we who sit on our computers and internet cannot judge to oursleves if abortion shold be made legal or illegal. And we should not always bring the God almighty to unnecessary discussions and make people who dont belive in him to make a fool at him or mock him. Thank you. (believe it or not)

    • Halfbiscuithalfmachine

      no it bloody isn’t. “Ashamed of herself” ha! From someone who is an advocate of sterilization?  The shame is on you brother

  • Jeanine

    Another very tricky subject, yes I think that it is a real need to have women like Rebecca to be able to give to all those girls or women the possibility to decide what they want and not what the others want for them.
    It’s again some religions, but at the end what is best?
    Being the one the decides if yes or not you desire a child……………
    Thx Rebecca for this difficult work and yeah Enzo, we all have to know about this difficulties around the world

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nancy-Reisiger-Rice/100001095785143 Nancy Reisiger Rice

      “Being the one that decides if yes or not you desire a child” is totally selfish!  You decide if you desire to have a child when you desire sexual intercourse and YOU must accept your responsibility for the consequences of that decision.  
      Your unborn child “desires” and deserves to exist!  You have NO right to kill a baby so you can live as you wish because of your selfish desire to have sex without consequences. Very “tricky” subject indeed!  A new life is a concept that is not difficult to understand!

      • Jouana

        No Nancy, your unborn child doesn’t desire to exist because your unborn child doesn’t exist. We are not talking about a child and we are not talking about killing a baby. We are talking about avoiding pregnancy when there are no conditions to welcome a newborn. Putting an undesired child into this world without offering  him/her the deserved care would be totally selfish and cruel.

      • Dorine

        No woman desires to have an abortion. It’s an extreme decision that is taken when there are no other solutions. On top of the suffering for the difficult decision, a woman doesn’t need the danger of an illegal abortion. And definitely not your judgment.

      • shopping nut

        Not true at all.   I’ve spent 2 decades working in healthcare and I know of several promiscuous women who’ve had 4-5 abortions, to them it’s obviously birth control and they couldn’t care less….and these are only 2 cases.   There are always other solutions; keeping her legs together, giving baby up for ADOPTION, for example.   There are hundreds of thousands of couples in this world who would give anything and any amount of  money to adopt a baby; some are on waitlists for years.  Give your head a shake.

  • ProChoiceGrandma

    Great concept, but only 1 ship, worldwide??  Even if you had a fleet, it still doesn’t help girls and women who do not have the funds to get to the coast and then 12 miles out to sea. 

    • Daiane Hays

      They mail medication to countries where abortion is illegal too.

  • Julia

    what was the idea again? distributing the morning-after pill in 1 ship? really, that´s the great idea?

    • Julia

      i never ever trust anything related to greenpeace… no science involved over there, only personal interests…. 

    • Andrea

      RU486 (Mifepristone) is an abortion pill and it’s used only after pregnancy is established. Plan B (Levonorgestrel) is an emergency contaceptive pill, also known as the morning after pill. They are not the same thing.

  • shopping nut

    WOW…..so concerned about the ‘needless deaths of women every 6 minutes’ but couldn’t give a shyte about 41 Million aborted babies each year.   These women make the CHOICE to murder their unborn and they have to accept the consequences but the innocent lives they helped to create apparently have no choice —– except to be murdered….and here we have a medical professional who vowed to “do no harm”, giving step by step instructions on her Facebook page on how to accomplish a Do It Yourself Abortion by lying to obtain medications, overdosing on said medication, then when hemorrhaging occurs one should get themselves to a doctor and yet again LIE and claim she’s having a miscarriage.   What a total douche.

    • Jouana

      Dear Shopping Nut, when you have an abortion you don’t kill anyone because there is no one to kill. There is no baby there. But if the baby will born from a mother
      that is not ready, that doesn’t want to be a mother (may be she was raped),
      that has no money, that is barely able to take care of herself… that’s serious
      harm to the baby. 

    • http://www.enzodalverme.com/blog enzo dal verme

      According to the book Freakonomics and the researches mentioned, unwanted babies are much more likely to become criminals. Abortion is not only a personal issue, but a social issue too. 
      In the United States, abortion was legalized in 1973. Before that date, abandoned women, raped women, teens, poors and drug addicted could not abort legally. As a matter of facts, in the 1990s America experienced a significant crime-drop. 
      Apparently, the unhappy babies that would have become criminals were the unwanted ones. 
      Putting an unwanted child into this world is not only causing serious harm to the baby but also to society.

Hard Cover

check it out

Photo Gallery

visit my photo gallery

Don’t miss a post! Subscribe via EMAIL

I will not give you email address away

KEEP IN TOUCH

facebook linkedin twitter rss feed

© 2012 Enzo Dal Verme.

Credits